Editorial Methodology
How We Build Public-Facing Metaphysics Content
OpenFate articles are produced from a layered workflow: chart-engine validation, source-based interpretation design, AI-assisted drafting, and final editorial review. The goal is not to present metaphysics as science, but to publish internally consistent, well-labeled, and responsibly framed traditional-analysis content.
| Section | Methodology Details |
|---|---|
| Editorial Principles |
|
| Review Workflow |
|
| How We Use AI | AI assists drafting, comparison, and multilingual adaptation, but it does not replace chart logic, labeling discipline, or editorial responsibility. We keep disclaimers visible and avoid presenting traditional metaphysics as a substitute for modern professional advice. |
| Questions or Corrections | If you find an entity inconsistency, content issue, or language-quality problem, contact the team through the main support channels listed in our privacy and terms pages so we can review the relevant page. |
How We Treat Metaphysical Content
OpenFate publishes Bazi, Ziwei Doushu, Western astrology, compatibility, Huangli, and personality content as interpretive cultural material. The editorial workflow separates chart calculation, AI-assisted explanation, human review, source structure, and user-facing disclaimers so each article can be useful without pretending to replace professional advice.
- Calculation pages should expose enough context for users to understand what the tool is producing.
- Insight pages should explain assumptions, limits, and next steps instead of only giving conclusions.
- Sensitive topics such as money, health, relationships, and legal decisions require clear boundaries.